Your point initially was that the battery would be depleted on a long drive and that you'd only have the 4-cylinder to rely on. That's not the case, as the article explains: the engine can recharge the battery in that scenario.Thanks for the link: and it kinda makes my point.
Are Hybrids Good for Long-Distance Driving?
Adding electrification to an internal combustion engine (ICE)—better known as a hybrid—typically yields fuel economy improvements; however, these improvements tend to have the greatest impact in city driving, and not on a long-distance highway drive. That's not to say hybrid vehicles sip fuel at an equal rate to their gas-only counterparts on highway drives, but typically the delta between these two types of powertrains is smaller in this setting.
Yes, the article goes on to explain the process. Range anxiety is eliminated and overall there is better fuel economy... But, given the reduced towing capacity Hyundai acknowledges performance is reduced. Trade-offs that may be acceptable
I was wrong with my understanding of "this" hybrid. Time will tell how successful this concept is.Your point initially was that the battery would be depleted on a long drive and that you'd only have the 4-cylinder to rely on. That's not the case, as the article explains: the engine can recharge the battery in that scenario.
The fact that a hybrid offers more improvements in city driving was never disputed. In fact, as I've mentioned twice now, you don't need that much power to maintain speed on a highway (that's why mpg is higher on a highway than in city driving, that the RPM is low and that the car stays in the highest possible gear). So the benefits of a hybrid power-train are not as large on a highway. But the battery won't be depleted, as you stated, and leave you with just the 4-cylinder to move you around. That's what I was addressing.
The reduced towing capacity wasn't disputed either.